| Title |
Tympanic border cells are Wnt-responsive and can act as progenitors for postnatal mouse cochlear cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Development (09501991), February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1242/dev.087528 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taha Adnan Jan, Renjie Chai, Zahra Nabi Sayyid, Renée van Amerongen, Anping Xia, Tian Wang, Saku Tapani Sinkkonen, Yi Arial Zeng, Jared Ruben Levin, Stefan Heller, Roel Nusse, Alan Gi-Lun Cheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 24% |
| Researcher | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,529,984
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Development (09501991)
#566
of 9,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,586
of 205,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development (09501991)
#3
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.