Title |
Snakes partition their body to traverse large steps stably
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental Biology, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1242/jeb.185991 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sean W. Gart, Thomas W. Mitchel, Chen Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 13 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 27% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#879,481
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Biology
#542
of 9,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,206
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Biology
#31
of 413 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 413 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.