| Title |
Host manipulation by an ichneumonid spider ectoparasitoid that takes advantage of preprogrammed web-building behaviour for its cocoon protection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Biology, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1242/jeb.122739 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keizo Takasuka, Tomoki Yasui, Toru Ishigami, Kensuke Nakata, Rikio Matsumoto, Kenichi Ikeda, Kaoru Maeto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 11 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Morocco | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 85% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 407. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2023.
All research outputs
#74,019
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Biology
#38
of 9,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#697
of 279,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Biology
#3
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.